Potter Speaks Out On U.K. Technology Strategy
The
Standard Europe
(February
19, 2001)
Our man at the ministry?
Britain's first e-envoy
was given a hard task – to turn the country
into the world's centre for Internet commerce.
He lasted nine months. Is his successor any
more likely to succeed? By Lisa Naylor
The best way to sell
something in 1998 – no matter what – was
to slap the letter "e" in front of
it. Even the British government caught the
buzzword bug when, in November that year, it
advertised the position of e-envoy, hoping to
hire someone who could make the UK "the
best environment worldwide in which to trade
electronically". The successful candidate
would report to the minister for trade and
industry and the prime minister.Nearly a year
later, in September 1999, the appointee was
announced – a man better known for his Web
directory of Grateful Dead lyrics than his
experience in the Internet sector. Alex Allan
had been the British High Commissioner to
Australia, his homeland, and private secretary
to the former British prime minister, John
Major. The combination of diplomatic skills
and a love of IT were seen as ideal for the
post. However, a link to his wife's
art-dealing site from the official e-envoy Web
site eventually brought embarrassment. He was
in the position for only nine months before
resigning for personal reasons. The original
mission of the £127,000-a-year (€198,000)
position was threefold. First, to ensure that
all government services could be delivered
online by 2005. Second, to realise Tony
Blair's dream that the UK would become the
best place in the world to do e-business.
Third, to act as an ambassador for UK
e-commerce, spreading the word of the
government's commitment to the Internet
economy. But as the position evolved, and
government departments encountered difficulty
in implementing technology plans, the mission
expanded to include managing governmental IT
projects.The creation of the office was
controversial from the outset. Most observers
agreed with the concept but not the execution.
"It was a good idea, although a
cabinet-level e-secretary of state with a new
department would have been better," says
Caspar Bowden, director of the independent,
London-based Foundation for Information Policy
Research. Others are more critical. Alan
Duncan, the shadow minister for trade and
industry, says: "It's very gimmicky to
label a civil servant this way. There should
either be a minister who is accountable to
parliament or a civil servant with a job. It
should not be an agency; it should be a
Whitehall post. "During Allan's short
reign, he used his considerable charisma to
raise the profile of the office and get a
number of important projects off the ground.
In an ambitious expansion of his original
mandate, he vowed to "drag the senior
civil service – squarely into the 21st
century". He took charge of the launch of
the government portal UK Online, announced the
formation of Trust UK, a scheme to boost
consumer confidence in Internet transactions,
and visited counterparts in Norway and the
U.S. Jim Norton – head of e-business policy at
the Institute of Directors – had been asked
by ministers to look into e-government and he
produced a paper that led to the creation of
the e-envoy. However, he says the office
developed differently from the way he had
envisaged. "I imagined something much
smaller that didn't run projects itself but
acted as a gamekeeper," he says.
"But the office is now a poacher as well.
It's seen in Whitehall as a rival [to other
government departments]. I'd prefer to see an
e-envoy who has a lower profile and whose job
it is to make the e-minister a roaring
success. "Andrew Pinder stood in as
temporary envoy when Allan left, and he won
the job permanently in January. He has spoken
out to justify Allan's high profile. "The
stage of the project has changed," he
says. "[Allan's] main task was to get
both the existence of the role and mission of
the role out there, so he made a lot of
speeches and did a lot of
consciousness-raising. "Pinder
brings a mix of private and public-sector
experience to the job. He was an IT director
at the Inland Revenue and has held senior
posts at Prudential and Citibank. But he has
inherited a nest of half-incubated eggs.
According to the less-than-speedy e-envoy
site, www.e-envoy.gov.uk, the amount of
official business that can be carried out
online is limited. UK citizens can fill in a
tax return, order a passport and check travel
information. Pinder says about 40 per cent of
services are online, but adds: "Services
can be defined in many ways. People go to
government Web sites to look at information,
to download data, to download forms, to carry
out some simple transactions. The things that
are in short supply are
transactions."Last July, Allan announced
the launch of eStatMap on the e-envoy site.
This service is supposed to provide
high-quality statistics on the progress of
e-commerce in the UK. While there are plenty
of figures for individuals and businesses –
all out of date – most of the statistics for
the government have not yet been collected.
Pinder admits that it is not a priority and
that "we haven't put a particular amount
of effort into that".As for being the
best place in the world to do e-business,
official figures show that only 27 per cent of
British companies are using the Net for either
business-to-customer or business-to-business
transactions. Figures for Sweden and Germany
are 85 and 47 per cent respectively. And,
according to a recent survey, Net users pay
more for high-speed access in the UK than in
any other leading industrialised country. But
the government is certainly trying. It
invested £25 million (€39 million) in the
launch of UK Online Citizen Portal – an
initiative which aims to help people and small
to medium businesses make better use of new
technologies. Heavily discounted computing
courses are available in new centres across
Britain, and advice lines are open for smaller
businesses wanting to improve their use of
technology. However, some people still think
that the government is focusing on the wrong
things. Duncan says: "E-commerce needs
almost no official interference, and
e-government is still not working. Every
[government] computer system designed so far
has failed dismally and we do not need the
government claiming credit for things that
companies are already achieving
themselves. "Norton agrees that
"e-business is not doing badly – so
less input is needed". But he adds:
"E-government needs the input. "As
for the future of the office, Pinder says:
"In the longer term, I hope that what we
will succeed in doing is embedding this agenda
so thoroughly – in both the public's mind
and out there in the private sector and also
in government – that there won't need to be
another e-envoy. I think that I should be the
last one."
UK Online: Is Labour
Working?
Michael Potter director
of VC firm Paradigm Ventures
Cathy Bryan commercial
director of uploaded.com, the online version
of Loaded magazine
David Cleevely managing
director of Analysys, a communications and new
media consultancy
Malcolm Davies head of
fraud and security at Telewest
Martina King managing
director of Yahoo UK and Ireland
Q1. Do you think that
this government has achieved anything for the
Internet Economy?
Michael Potter
The real question is:
"Where has the government gone
wrong?" Tony Blair's rhetoric is
generally pro-UK, taking a leading role in the
global Net economy. But the political and
governmental machine below him continually
takes action that frustrates his vision. Blame
falls directly on the shoulders of the DTI and
Oftel.
First it is important to
realise that the European Union has initiated
infringement proceedings against the UK for
its failure to comply with European
telecommunications laws.
Telecoms – and
particularly the penetration of low-cost
broadband technology – is one of the most
important indicators of how well the UK will
be positioned to compete in the global
information economy. Germany, for instance,
which is largely compliant with European law,
is two years ahead of the UK in broadband.
Cathy Bryan
Nothing tangible to the
business community. I have a commercial
[business] and I need people to be online and
to transact. I do not see that confidence
growing. [The Net] is not accessible to very
young people and people who do not have credit
cards. There has been a lot of talk of digital
wallets to get over this, but nothing has
taken off.
David Cleevely
Yes, by raising the
profile and getting people talking – even if
some of the discussion has been cynical.
Malcolm Davies
It is making efforts.
From what I know, the government has a policy
to bring about change, but I have yet to see
any evidence. I have a general awareness that
while the government welcomes e-commerce, it
is generated more by companies themselves.
Labour is certainly dragging its feet with
regard to a decision on acceptable levels of
encryption.
Martina King
The appointment of an
e-envoy opened new channels of communication
for the e-commerce community. Oftel's
overhauling of BT's price controls and
local-loop unbundling reduced the cost of
accessing the Web and encouraged greater
competitiveness. The UK leads Europe in
broadband.
Q2. Do you think the
Internet Economy would benefit from a change
of government?
Michael Potter
The Internet Economy
would greatly benefit from very radical
changes to this government. Because radical
change is unlikely, the country would be
better served by a new government altogether.
Cathy Bryan
No. If anything, the
situation would deteriorate. In general,
policy-makers have a low degree of technical
literacy and their involvement in the sector
is very poor.
David Cleevely
It's unlikely. The
government has been prudent and has some
leeway on spending. With the US going into
recession, cuts in expenditure could have bad
effects. An anti-Europe stance could
accentuate this. The Tories have never shown
much interest in the new economy. John Redwood
as Secretary of State for Wales supposedly cut
the computer budget after saying people didn't
need computers on their desks. There is a
great need for innovation, especially in the
civil service. The government is at least
trying to do something about it.
Malcolm Davies
A change within
government would be better.
Martina King
No government of any hue
can afford to ignore the challenges inherent
in the global digital economy. Obtaining and
maintaining a leading share of the world's
e-commerce markets remains a constant.
Therefore dialogue with key industry players
is fundamental to meet our shared objectives,
and I have no doubt that it would continue
with any change in government.
Q3. What change in the
law would most benefit you in your area of
business?
Michael Potter
The critical issue is to
ensure that BT complies with basic competition
law and basic European telecoms law, including
compensation for previous and ongoing
anti-competitive behaviour. For instance,
Oftel has recently concluded that BT is
overcharging for leased lines. This has been a
violation of European law since the beginning
of 1994. However, Oftel is not interested in
BT compensating consumers for these
violations. Oftel is simply trying to lower
the rates for some time in the future.
Cathy Bryan
It would be great if
schools or publicly funded organisations were
required to provide access to the Net for
those who wouldn't otherwise get it.
David Cleevely
I could think of some
taxation issues, especially National Insurance
on options, but not much on the law.
Malcolm Davies
I would benefit from two
changes. First, to the Copyright, Designs and
Patents Act. At the moment, we are targeting
people who make and supply illicit devices
which allow all-channel viewing for free. It
is a summary offence which carries a two-year
sentence. That is too restrictive; it needs to
be made into an arrestable offence. Secondly,
we should have an act on fraud. There is
currently no statutory definition of fraud in
criminal law, and people are using technology
to facilitate crime.
Martina King
Clarification of the
liability of content aggregators, ISPs or
forum providers for third-party content.
Q4. Do you know what the
e-envoy does?
Michael Potter
The e-envoy is for
politicians to point to a sexy title and
proclaim that they are tackling very difficult
issues, when in fact the e-envoy is just part
of the problem of helping to rearrange the
deck-chairs on the Titanic.
Cathy Bryan
Kind of. The person
responsible for overseeing Internet issues
within the government, pulling together
government departments.
David Cleevely
Promoting awareness of
the e-economy.
Malcolm Davies
I don't know what his
objectives are.
Martina King
To motivate UK business
in acknowledging the essential role e-commerce
plays in competitiveness and to tackle the
challenges this entails. To assist the policy
that all government services to the citizen
and business should be available online by
2005.
Q5. Would you lobby the
e-envoy on issues concerning the Internet
Economy?
Michael Potter
The e-envoy is not
responsible for compliance with European law.
The e-envoy is not responsible for ensuring
that BT complies with competition law. The
e-envoy is not responsible for ensuring that
small and medium-sized enterprises are
competitive in the global economy. If the
e-envoy were to embrace these burdens and
responsibilities, then I would take time out
of my schedule to discuss these profound
issues.
Cathy Bryan
I am not confident that
that is the best use of my time or if that
person has enough clout. If the e-envoy were a
cabinet minister, then possibly.
David Cleevely
Probably. It is likely
that I'll get to talk to him fairly soon
anyway.
Malcolm Davies
If he wasn't doing what I
thought he should be, then yes.
Martina King
Yes. It is vital that
high priority is given to ensuring UK
businesses succeed online. The government's
provision of support, advice, and considerable
resources will only achieve its aim if direct
communication is maintained with the person
providing strategic input into the development
of e-government.
|