Thomas Samuel Kuhn (1922-1996)
He received a Ph. D. in physics from
Harvard University.
Of the
five books and countless articles he
published, Kuhn's most renown work is The
Structure of Scientific Revolutions, which he
wrote while a graduate student in theoretical
physics at Harvard. Initially published as a
monograph in the International Encyclopedia of
Unified Science, it was published in book form
by the University of Chicago Press in 1962. It
has sold some one million copies in 16
languages and is required reading in courses
dealing with education, history, psychology,
research, and, of course, history and
philosophy of science.
Throughout
thirteen succinct but thought-provoking
chapters, Kuhn argued that science is not a
steady, cumulative acquisition of knowledge.
Instead, science is "a series of peaceful
interludes punctuated by intellectually
violent revolutions," which he described
as "the tradition-shattering complements
to the tradition-bound activity of normal
science." After such revolutions,
"one conceptual world view is replaced by
another."
Although
critics chided him for his imprecise use of
the term, Kuhn was responsible for
popularizing the term paradigm, which he
described as essentially a collection of
beliefs shared by scientists, a set of
agreements about how problems are to be
understood. According to Kuhn, paradigms are
essential to scientific inquiry, for "no
natural history can be interpreted in the
absence of at least some implicit body of
intertwined theoretical and methodological
belief that permits selection, evaluation, and
criticism." Indeed, a paradigm guides the
research efforts of scientific communities,
and it is this criterion that most clearly
identifies a field as a science. A fundamental
theme of Kuhn's argument is that the typical
developmental pattern of a mature science is
the successive transition from one paradigm to
another through a process of revolution. When
a paradigm shift takes place, "a
scientist's world is qualitatively transformed
[and] quantitatively enriched by fundamental
novelties of either fact or theory."
|